Wednesday 4 November 2009

Opus Kura has issued new transfers of George Enescu's 1929 studio recordings of Corelli, Chausson, Kreisler, Pugnani and Handel, together with a 1950 recording of him playing his own third sonata (with CĂ©lingy Chailley-Richez). These 1929 Enescu recordings (almost the only ones he ever made, in his prime) are a whole master class in the art of violin playing and illustrate why the voice, the piano and the violin have triumphed over all other musical instruments when it comes to repertoire and popularity.

With Enescu, we hear incredible right arm techniques, truly magnificent trills, a highly sophisticated range of vibrato, the ability to paint with a broad palette of colours, the ability to combine rubato with firm rhythmic control. Corelli's La Follia variations illustrate almost every aspect of a violinist's art -- and also show you do not need to indulge in baroque follies in order to play 18th century music with no excesses of 19th century romanticism.

I expected Enescu in 1950 to sound well past his prime (he was partly crippled with a spinal disorder). But his playing of his own third sonata, despite the obstacles, is still better than anyone else I can think of. It is really tragic that the recording industry did not fight to record Enescu during the 1926-33 period; we have very few performance souvenirs of this great violinist.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Is it the third sonata recording better that the one he made with Lipatti?

Harry Collier said...

A surprisingly difficult question to answer. I have long loved the 1943 Lipatti-Enescu recording. Without making a direct head-to-head comparison, I would say that the violin playing is pretty well equal between the two versions, the piano playing is equally good, but the recording quality in 1950 is much better than the 1943 Romanian. For that reason, I suspect that, in future, I'll always put on the 1950 version.